+ http://www.sag.org/press-releases/december-12-2008/sag-announces-solidarity-campaign

Screen Actors Guild Announces “Solidarity Campaign”
First 31 “Solidarity Signers” add names to list of members in support of a “yes” vote on the strike authorization referendum.
Among the names are several prominent Academy Award™ nominees and recipients.

Los Angeles, December 12, 2008 -- Screen Actors Guild today announced the names of 30 recognizable members who, along with Guild national president Alan Rosenberg, signed SAG’s “Statement of Support.” The first signers include Mel Gibson, Ed Harris, Holly Hunter, Martin Sheen, Sandra Oh, Hal Holbrook, Dixie Carter, John Heard, Jerry O’Connell, Rob Morrow and 20 others.

Guild secretary treasurer Connie Stevens and 1st national vice president Anne-Marie Johnson also signed on to the statement as did board members Elliott Gould, Frances Fisher, Valerie Harper, Robert Hays, Justine Bateman, Clancy Brown, Charles Shaughnessy, Scott Bakula, Diane Ladd and others.

The SAG “Statement of Support” which reads:

“I support the Screen Actors Guild National Board of Directors request for members to vote YES to empower the National Board to decide whether to call a TV/Theatrical contract strike, and if so, determine its timeframe.

We must arm our negotiating committee with the collective unity and strength of the Screen Actors Guild members.”

Holbrook, Asner, Sheen, Ladd, Fisher, and Stevens have recorded video testimonials and topical messages that will debut on Screen Actors Guild’s website next week along with other celebrity testimonials.

The Guild’s website now features video messages from Bateman, Shaughnessy and Brown prominently displayed in a homepage video viewer.

Initial signers include:

Ed Asner
Scott Bakula
Justine Bateman
Clancy Brown
Dixie Carter
George Coe
Anne DeSalvo
Frances Fisher
Mel Gibson
Brian Goodman
Elliot Gould
Ed Harris
Valerie Harper
John Heard
Robert Hays
Hal Holbrook
Holly Hunter
Anne-Marie Johnson
Diane Ladd
William Mapother
Kent McCord
Rob Morrow
Jerry O'Connell
Sandra Oh
Alan Rosenberg
Alan Ruck
Charles Shaughnessy
Martin Sheen
Connie Stevens
Renee Taylor
Alicia Witt

All SAG members are invited to sign the “Statement of Support” by emailing their name and member number to Contract2008@sag.org.

Video statements of support are playing now at www.sag.org.

+ http://www.variety.com/article/VR1117997375.html?categoryid=18&cs=1

SAG's war hits home

East, West guilds battle over strike

Civil war has broken out at the Screen Actors Guild.

Gotham leaders of SAG are demanding that the guild's plan to seek a strike authorization vote be called off due to the faltering economy, and they want the guild's contract negotiating committee replaced in the hopes that new blood will help end the guild's months-long stalemate with the majors.

SAG president Alan Rosenberg responded by setting the emergency national board meeting for Friday at SAG's Hollywood headquarters -- but he insists that the New York guild reps attend in person. Rosenberg blasted SAG's Gotham toppers for their "extraordinarily destructive and subversive" action.

A guild spokeswoman said SAG would not comment on why the emergency board meeting is a "face to face" session. New York reps indicated that requiring cross-country travel on short notice, when videoconferencing equipment is readily available, can only be interpreted as punitive and designed to hold down attendance by opponents of the guild's Hollywood leadership.

The skirmish that erupted after the New York board, headed by prexy Sam Freed, spoke out against the strike authorization vote on Friday afternoon widens the gulf between SAG leaders in Hollywood and the rest of the country. New York board member Mike Hodge had already publicly criticized the decision to seek the strike authorization vote, while Gotham board member Richard Masur, a former SAG prexy, has been a longtime foe of the guild's current Hollywood leadership.

Rosenberg and national exec director Doug Allen are certain to receive a chilly reception tonight at a townhall meeting for New York members at the Westin Times Square. That confab was scheduled a week ago to discuss the strike authorization, which is still set to go out Jan. 2 with results announced Jan. 23.

The New York division leaders -- who rep about 25% of SAG's 120,000 members -- noted in their statement that while they had voted in October to support seeking a strike authorization if federal mediation failed, conditions have changed since then.

"While issuing a strike authorization may have been a sensible strategy in October, we believe it is irresponsible to do so now, in the face of widespread layoffs, cutbacks and reduced programming," the N.Y. board said in a statement. "The hardest and most important decision any union member must make is whether or not to go on strike. Before we ask you to make that choice, we feel we must, as your elected representatives, make every move we can to get you a deal."

In addition to seeking the emergency board meeting, the New York reps asked that all plans for a strike referendum cease; a new negotiating task force to replace the current negotiating committee at this emergency meeting; and that the Alliance of Motion Picture & Television Producers be encouraged "in the strongest of terms" to return to the bargaining table.

Control of SAG's national board shifted in September elections away from Rosenberg's Membership First allies to a more moderate coalition of New York and regional reps along with half a dozen board members elected from Hollywood in the Unite for Strength faction, including Amy Brenneman and Kate Walsh. But the negotiating committee remains under the control of Membership First.

"With a fresh team, the AMPTP will return to the table, and we can get a fair deal," the N.Y. reps said. "A deal that will not cost careers, homes, lives. We want our members to understand that while strikes are sometimes unavoidable, we will do everything in our power to avoid this one."

Rosenberg responded by saying the global economy was already failing before the new board OK'd the plan to take a strike vote should the attempt at federal mediation fail to end the six month-long stalemate between SAG and the AMPTP. The sides held two sessions last month with a federal mediator, who called the process off on Nov. 22.

"We are keenly aware of and sensitive to the fact that the economy has further declined since then," Rosenberg added. "When economic times are tough, members rely on their union even more to protect them from management's tactics. I believe we must be even more vigilant during these challenging times. The solution to the industry's economic hardship must not be rollbacks that cripple our member's ability to earn a living."

The AMPTP made its final offer on June 30 as SAG's primetime-feature contract expired. Over 75% of SAG members who vote would have to affirm the authorization, with the national board having the final say, if SAG is to go on strike.

The PR campaigns to persuade actors have continued in high gear as SAG announced late Friday that it had launched a "solidarity statement" campaign for members to declare their support of a "yes" vote. The first 31 signers included Mel Gibson, Ed Harris, Hal Holbrook, Holly Hunter and Martin Sheen, along with board members Scott Bakula, Justine Bateman, Frances Fisher, Elliott Gould, Diane Ladd and Kent McCord.

For its part, the AMPTP went to elected officials with a blast at SAG leaders on Friday by sending a letter to leading members of the California delegation including House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and U.S. Sens. Barbara Boxer and Dianne Feinstein along with local, state and national elected officials in New York, Illinois and Michigan.

The missive, penned by AMPTP president Nick Counter, excoriated SAG leaders for refusing to accept the AMPTP's final offer, which contains similar terms to those in Hollywood labor agreements concluded this year by the WGA, DGA, IATSE, casting directors and AFTRA.

"Now, astonishingly, SAG is demanding that working actors attempt to wipe away the consequences of SAG's failed negotiating strategy by authorizing a strike," Counter said. "This strike vote is remarkable because it comes at a time when prominent economists are saying that the current recession may turn out to be the longest and most painful downturn since the Great Depression."

SAG deputy national exec director Pamm Fair disputed the majors' contention that SAG should accept a deal similar to those signed by the other unions.

"Screen Actors Guild represents actors who have different needs than writers, directors and crew members," Fair said in a statement. "We are different, not better. Our unique needs require that we negotiate a fair contract specific to actors, background actors and stunt performers, and not simply accept what has been agreed to by our sister unions."

Guild leaders have insisted that the needs of actors -- particularly in new media -- have not been adequately addressed in the AMPTP's final offer, issued June 30 as SAG's contract expired.

The AMPTP also took out an ad in today's Daily Variety that attempts to refute Rosenberg on statements he's made about the final offer such as it representing the "beginning of the end of residuals."

In response, the congloms contend that the proposed deal includes the first-ever residuals for ad-supported streaming for features and TV; an increased residual rate for permanent downloads; first-ever residuals for derivative new media and original programs; exclusive SAG jurisdiction for new-media programs; and jurisdiction over "high budget" original new media productions and low-budget programs that employ a single "covered" actor.

SAG has insisted that the budget thresholds in the AMPTP proposal -- $15,000 per minute or $300,000 per production -- will lead to the guild sanctioning non-union work as more production migrates to new media platforms.

SAG fired back Sunday night, accusing the AMPTP of lying about the offer and asserting that streaming of new TV shows on new media platforms will pay day performers $46 for the first year뭩 use after a 17-day free rerun window. It also complained about the jurisdiction language; the lack of compensation for original programming on network sites as abc.com; and rollbacks in clip consent and force majeure.

"Management is offering a lousy deal with 'zero' in new media and is threatening the promotion of non-union work in a residual-free environment without minimum compensation," SAG concluded. "That could be the beginning of the end for actors careers and livelihoods.

Oscar Roundtable: The Actors

Posted 2008. 12. 14. 19:14

+ http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_display/film/news/e3i4d2fc033695aeece6068de79b0861d88

Ed Harris (left), Josh Brolin, Hugh Jackman, Richard Jenkins, Mickey Rourke, Benicio Del Toro (Photos by Kharen Hill)

Oscar Roundtable: The Actors

By Stephen Galloway and Elizabeth Guider

Dec 9, 2008, 11:00 PM ET

From riding the open range to traveling in the shoes of infamous political figures, this awards season's most buzzed-about performers have logged a lot of mileage this year. The Hollywood Reporter's Matthew Belloni gathered six actors -- Josh Brolin (Lionsgate's "W.," Focus Features' "Milk"), Benicio Del Toro (IFC Films' "Che"), Ed Harris (Warner Bros.' "Appaloosa"), Hugh Jackman (Fox's "Australia"), Richard Jenkins (Overture's "The Visitor") and Mickey Rourke (Fox Searchlight's "The Wrestler") -- to discuss portraying real people on film, bringing their work home with them and how to handle a fight with a director.

The Hollywood Reporter: What has surprised you most about being an actor?

Ed Harris: As much as you prepare, or as much as you do your research, the actual doing is what is really enlightening and where the surprises come. It's like an unzipping. You pull yourself apart and discover what is inside. I hate working with some actors, none of whom are here at the moment, where it is so plotted out that there are no surprises. It is so plotted out that it is always the same. It is very mannered. Technique is great, but you have to be able to let go and see what is in there hiding away.

Richard Jenkins: I'm not being cute about this -- I'm surprised that I can make a living out of this. But having said that, being able to not censor yourself and let yourself go is a technique in itself. It's a scary thing.

Hugh Jackman: I was just doing ADR (additional dialogue recording) the other day, which I find tough and draining, and I found myself engaged, loving it. Making believe in this dark room with a microphone, watching myself on the screen, I was thinking that it couldn't be more odd. Yet the challenge of making him real and present and to make that character live in the voice, I thought, what kind of job at age 40 still kind of turns you on?

Harris: You make a film and you go around and do interviews and shit. Pardon -- my publicist said watch your language. It's true for all of us. You're acting, and the process of doing it informs your life as much as your life is informing your process. All of your senses are fucking alive.

THR: What kind of personal toll does this process take?

Harris: It doesn't take a toll. It's illuminating and invigorating.

Josh Brolin: You start blending your life. It's like if you jump out of airplanes, you get addicted to it until something goes wrong -- hopefully not. I love heightened states, racing cars, doing these things, but at the same time, if I treated my kids the same way I treat racing, it doesn't work. You have to separate yourself.

Harris: These guys who do film after film after film. It's a choice. I'm not making a judgment. But it takes care of one part of your life because it is your life.

THR: Josh, what are the guiding forces in the choices you make?

Brolin: I seem to get bored very easily. I've done a lot of theater, but I don't like doing plays for more than a couple of months. I get bored. So when I decide on a part, ultimately it's something that will hold my interest. I've just done a junket today about "Milk" and "W.," and they ask, "How can you make these guys sympathetic?" To me, everybody is human, and it's more interesting and colorful to delve into this pool of a human and not play a result of that human -- like, this guy murdered this guy, or this guy was president.

THR: Mickey, give us a little insight into your process.



Mickey Rourke: I studied so hard at the Actors Studio for years. I walked in one day and there was Al Pacino. I couldn't take my eyes off of him. There was Robert De Niro, Chris Walken -- Harvey Keitel snapped his fingers at me to move out of the way. I remember seeing him in "Mean Streets" (1973). And when you are working, when you are dedicating yourself, you want to be the best you can be because there are people before you who have raised the bar. But I was too naive to realize the politics of the business. When I got out here, I couldn't deal with that. I thought I was above that. I wasn't prepared enough. I wasn't educated enough.

THR: How long did it take you to get that education?

Rourke: Thirteen years of therapy. (Laughs.)

THR: But you feel like you're now educated?

Rourke: Oh yeah. But I paid a price for it. I never wanted to be second best; I wanted to be the best. And you're only as good as the material or your director. When you take a job for the money and the material sucks, then you just walk through. We've all done that. I'll never do it again.

THR: What does it mean for you to be in a role that has been as well-received as this one has?

Rourke: When you've been out of work as long as I have -- and it's been my fault -- but you get a second chance, it's kind of surreal. I'm not angry about it. I'm more grateful, and I understand that it's all my fault, and that there were mistakes. It was a process I had to go through. Someone asked me, do you think you could have given the same performance (in "The Wrestler") 15 years ago? I said yes. Then I said no, because (director Darren Aronofsky) would have seemed then to be an authority figure, and I would have been butting heads with him. So probably not.

THR: To what extent can an actor become another person?

Brolin: Unless you are a psychotic, insane person, there is a difference between playing a character and not. I'm sorry. I don't care how deep you are into it.

Benicio Del Toro: I see what I do like being a shoemaker. I take pride in what I do. The difference is that I go to the supermarket and people come running at me. There are advantages and disadvantages. It gets confusing. The craft of acting is one thing. The other side -- how to stay real -- if you don't separate it, you can get really confused.

Brolin: There is a fear that you will fuck up or lose it. For me, it started with a play, "True West." I left for three days because they were deciding whether or not they wanted to continue the play or not. I left and took a little vacation and when I went back, I gave the worst fucking performance of my life because I completely separated myself. So I always have a healthy fear that if I just keep the character running at all times (it will work out), and I feel obligated to do that. I know people who go to the trailer and play PlayStation. But at the same time, you are there to do a job. You are there to be professional. Know your stuff. Once it's done, you are done.

THR: How does your approach to a role change when you are playing a real person?



Brolin: It's not the same. It's great because you have the information. But it's a little more disconcerting because there is some form of copy that goes into it. I want to get that voice or the body language. Then you have to always personalize it. You have to humanize the character. To not do that doesn't make any sense.

Jackman: Were you more stringent to mimic Bush?

Brolin: Less with Bush. More with Dan White (in "Milk"). The reason is that there are so many characters to play in "W." With Dan White, we covered 10 months. With Bush (we covered) 37 years. It starts with him at 21 years old and ends up at 58. It's very rare to do that. You have to start graphing out. Where were the milestones? When did this change? What is the difference between him at 21 and 25?

THR: Benicio, was that your process as well with Che?

Del Toro: Pretty much what (Brolin) said. But I think his is harder. His is 37 years. Mine is 10 or less. I don't have Che on CNN every night, but I have history. I got to meet people who knew him and told me things about him. In the end, (Brolin) is doing an interpretation. So am I. I'm not Che.

Rourke: I got an ashtray at home with Che's face on it. Yeah, he does look like you. (Laughs.)

THR: Mickey, how do you prepare for a part?

Rourke: I was fortunate enough to stumble into the Actors Studio. I had no money and no social life; I had nothing to do but study all the time. I wasn't screwing chicks or taking people out to dances. Studio 54 was going on but I didn't know about Studio 54. I was living in my little room, doing construction every day. I would grab bums off the street to read lines with. This whole Stanislavski thing boils down to: You are as good as your teacher, and you are as good as the hard work you put into it. If you haven't done it, or studied it to the fullest extent, then you can't f***ing teach it. There are a lot of teachers out there, but only a few can really tap into it. I made a choice in ("The Wrestler"). I said, I want to wear a hearing aid. And I made the choice not because I needed a prop but because I knew a wrestler who was once a bodybuilder, and he blew out both his eardrums 'cause he used to work building Harleys. And I had to fight like hell for this. Darren said to me, "I'm not going to give you one of your Method-actor studio props." And I said, "Whoa whoa whoa. Will you rethink this?" And then he did something that I think was smart: He underused it. I probably would have overused it. But I justified the choice.

THR: You brought up an interesting point. What is the best way to handle a major disagreement with a director?

Rourke: I had to learn the hard way. Early on, I worked with some real good guys: Coppola, Cimino, Alan Parker, Adrian Lyne. As long as I have respect for the director, I will give him my lungs. But as soon as I needed to pay my mortgage on some stupid house in Beverly Hills that I couldn't afford, I'm working on a piece that I don't believe in and working for a director who's letting another actor tell him where to put the camera. I learned a lesson that I need to live within my means so that I don't have to whore myself and go to work on some piece of crap with somebody that I don't respect.

THR: Ed, what's the secret to directing yourself?



Harris: I can't explain it. I just feel comfortable doing it. Directing is a compulsion. It's instinctive: "I want to do this thing."

THR: Does anyone else have any desire to direct?

Harris: Mickey, you'd be great at it.

Rourke: I thought about that. But if I was the director then I would still be feuding as we're talking here, so I don't think I'm cut out for it.

Jackman: Not for me. I feel I'm too indecisive on the little things. I don't have the confidence. It took me years before I finally understood the camera and how to tell a story visually. I feel more informed by atmosphere and rhythm and audience, and that sort of thing. So as an actor, I can feel that.

Jenkins: I've directed a lot of theater, and what I've found is that I am really an actor. I did love rehearsal and exploring stuff, but I also feel as a director, you know this movie better than anybody. I can't see a movie in my head. I work with the Coen brothers a lot and it's there -- they have a movie in their head. They let you do your work, but man, my brain doesn't work that way.

THR: Can a good actor play almost any role?

Jenkins: No. Maybe I am giving myself away as not a good actor, but I think we have limitations, and the older I get, I realize I can't do everything. Even though you would like to think you can, that's just my opinion. There are things I read and I think, I don't know what I'd bring to this. There are people who can do this better than me.

Brolin: We have limitations, but what limitations? We don't know our limitations until we experience them. I can go play a jock and people will say, "Hey, he's got the hair, he's got the jaw." But then I play it and I'm awful because I don't understand it.

THR: Hugh, do you feel like there are parts you can't play because of your status as a movie star?



Jackman: No, that doesn't come into my mind. But there are some things I read, and I just go, "No." You generally get a gut feeling. You've got that compulsion to play (a part). People will say, "You're so wrong for that." But if you have that compulsion to play it, and it turns you on but you feel a little bit scared, then give it a go. And if they close the door, say, "You were right, but thanks for giving me a shot."

THR: How has the business changed the most in the last 15-20 years?

Rourke: Well, I wasn't in the business for the last 15 years. You're asking the wrong guy! (Laughs.) I don't look at this whole thing as a business, but you've got to meet these guys in an office. They aren't always the most pleasant people, those casting people. I remember some dude sitting there and eyeballing me and I thought, "What the fuck does he want?" You got to get over that and go, "Hi, how are you doing? I like that shirt." And that's a game. So it starts that way. A lot of us aren't prepared for that. There are so many actors out there now that are movie stars because they're good at that. They know how to be political and get by being mediocre -- and get paid a lot of money. You look at guys back in the day like Monty Clift and Brando -- they were all actors. Richard Harris. Those guys. I like to read biographies. I read the Errol Flynn biography -- Jesus Christ! I've been there and back! His career was over by 41. The guy was beautiful and he really wanted to be an actor, not a sword-doer, and they put him in a category. Here was a guy who had it all but then he self-destructed.

Harris: It's a business. That's the huge problem. It's a huge corporate business.

THR: But it's a business built on creativity.

Harris: No, it's not a business built on creativity at all. It's built on the almighty dollar. Let's be real.

Brolin: The business is creative. But a lot of times, when the business people try to make creative decisions, things get really muddy. I've been fortunate to work with these amazing filmmakers recently. Instead of taking the extra buck, they are willing to give it up in order to have final cut. For them, it's most important. The Coens are a perfect example. "O Brother, Where Art Thou?" made a lot of money, especially the music. The music made over $200 million, but I don't think they saw but 5 cents of that whole thing, and they are OK with that because they got final cut.

THR: Do you ever try to predict how well your movies will do?

Brolin: We were convinced "No Country for Old Men" wasn't going to make a cent. The Coens actually said that to me, "Nobody is going to see this movie." You never know.

Harris: We were lucky to get "Appaloosa" out there. If you were to talk to me three months ago, I thought it was going to go straight to video. I called up (Alan) Horn at Warner Bros. personally, and I said, "Look if you don't back this a little bit, you know it'll be gone in a week, and it's a good film. It deserves a shot at something." The guy heard me and respected me, and respected the film and got behind it, to a good degree.

THR: What would you do if you weren't an actor?



Jenkins: I drove a laundry truck and had seven accidents in two months. One -- I wasn't even in the truck. A laundry bag hit the gear. It rolled down and hit a guy's parked car. There is nothing I would do.

Rourke: I had a candy store. It was in an alleyway. We sold candy. Our clientele were the Hells Angels and Bob Dylan with his hood on. Nobody knew who Bob was. He was real quiet. Then the Hells Angels would come in. Then the beautiful models. Christy Turlington. It was one hell of a candy store. I had a private office in the back. It was '50s-style. We had a humidifier and blue smoke came out of the pipes. We would all get on the motorcycles at night. I wanted a place to hang out with people that I wanted to hang out with. It was a boys and girls club.

Del Toro: Bullfighter.

Jackman: I wanted to be a radio stringer. I wanted to go around the world with a recorder, and I got my journalism degree and was all ready to go. Somehow I detoured.

Brolin: The whole reason I became an actor is because you can play all the different professions that you wouldn't have to honestly feel pressure to accomplish.

Harris: I've grown fond of horses over the years. I would like to learn how to train horses. I would need somebody to help me out.

THR: Is there another era in which you would have liked to be an actor?

Del Toro: I'm OK. I think it's the same stuff that went on. At least from what I've read.

Rourke: It's like they say, "Who is the best fighter who has ever lived?" What era? You can't compare Joe Lewis to Muhammed Ali. You can't compare someone today with Joe DiMaggio. Different eras. Back in the day, guys worked jobs. Now they just work out all the time.


Holland`s films at NYC MOMA

Posted 2008. 12. 9. 17:24

+ http://www.polskieradio.pl/thenews/culture/?id=97585

Holland's films at NYC MOMA

Created: 08.12.2008 12:32
A retrospective of the film output of the prominent Polish director, Agnieszka Holland, opens at the Museum of Modern Art in New York on Wednesday, 10 December, with the screening of Copying Beethoven, introduced by Holland and Ed Harris, who plays Beethoven in the film.

The programme of the event includes her features made in the west over the past two decades, such as To Kill a Priest (about the murder of the Solidarity priest Father Jerzy Popieluszko in 1984), Europa, Europa, A Secret Garden, Washington Square, The Third Miracle and Total Eclipse, as well as her early films made in Poland in the 1970s which probed into various aspects of life under communism (Sunday Children, Screen Tests, Provincial Actors, A Lonely Woman).

The MOMA retrospective lasts until 5 January 2009.


Agnieszka Holland is a graduate of the Film Academy in Prague. She started her career in Poland in 1972 as an assistant to Krzysztof Zanussi. She settled in the West in 1981. A week ago, she celebrated her 60th birthday. (mk)

« PREV : 1 : ··· : 45 : 46 : 47 : 48 : 49 : 50 : 51 : ··· : 186 : NEXT »